Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johren (gaming platform)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:29, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Johren (gaming platform)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Video game platform of unclear notability. The third-party sources cited are [1] (not listed on WP:VGRS) and [2] (a porn news website). I can't read most other sources, but at a glance most don't appear reliable or independent. Google searches produce mentions of the site in the context of specific games, but no substantial coverage that I can see. Sandstein 06:12, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Sandstein 06:12, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete doesn't seem notable, neither has any substantial info. -Vipz (talk) 05:42, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This page has been created both in draft space and in article space, which is sometimes done to game the system. As a result, it cannot be moved from article space to draft space, but it can be and has been nominated for deletion. The pages in draft space and in article space are almost the same except as to references. The version in article space has been reference-bombed, mostly with Taiwanese references. However, the version in draft space has four references, which can reasonably be assumed to be the earliest and best, and have been checked. Only two of them check out, and they show that the platform is intended for erotic play with adult magical girls, but the references are more about the animated characters than the platform.

Reference Number	Reference	Comments	Independent	Significant
1	Gamespress	Discussion of a game and of magical girls played on the platform	Maybe	No - About the game and the magical girls
2	Lewd Games	Discussion of erotic magical girls on the platform	Probably not - Appears to be an advertising outlet	No - About the adult girls
3	Noisy Pixel	Has 404 error
4	Google search result	Google search result	No	No

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:51, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:54, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.